The girls on the view should go back to blathering about strippers and other nonessential "celebrities" rather than trying to talk politics. Their conduct was that of a pack of hyenas attacking Senator John McCain. They didn't let him talk. They kept changing the questions, interrupting and being very obnoxious. That is certainly one program that I will never watch again.
In contrast, they talked nicely to Obama, let him talk and listened to his views.
Their actions made me ashamed to be a woman and to see such hatred on television. I am turning off my ability to get ABC on my television. Thank God I have that choice.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Thursday, September 11, 2008
I was so offended by Barack Obama talk on 9/11
I watched both candidates talk. One encouraged ALL Americans to volunteer, young, old, etc. The other played only to the young people. What are the older people, something to throw out? Remember Mr. BO, if you live long enough, you too will be old, do you want someone talking to you as though you were good for nothing? I was highly offended and angered by Mr. Obama's remarks.
John McCain talked about encouraging people to volunteer. To do more for others. Do it even if the govt doesn't pay you to do it. I agree helping people to do more, like volunteer for the Americorps, the Peace Corps, the military is something that is very important and we need to reward them. Especially the military who put their lives (and the welfare of their family) on the line. Those who join Americorps and Peace Corps get benefits of money to go to school. To improve their future and hopefully go back to work with others to bring benefits to all Americans.
It seemed to me that John McCain sought people to stand up and serve and that Mr. Obama wanted to create more govt. Same-o, same-o. Bigger govt and bigger taxes. Talk to the young who are unable to make choices because of brain development and ignore those of us who have lived a little more of life to have witnessed another day the world stood still.
I, and many other "older" people, do many kinds of volunteer work. I teach knitting and help in the community, to donate the products of my sticks and string to others. Hats, scarves and mittens for others in need, as well as baby things for prospective mothers.
Since Mr. Obama feels that the govt should do the giving (remind me again, isn't that MY tax money you are using), HE IS A GREAT EXAMPLE. He only gives 1%, YES THAT IS ONLY ONE PERCENT, a penny on the dollar, to charity, or to church or to any other entity that helps those in need. No wonder he went to a church where the preacher told others to god damn america and other such bigoted hatred. He is a real example of living a lie.
So let those of us who do, respect those others who do as well. Those who have served our country throughout their lives and get this misogynist, craven, disgraceful, egocentric, bigoted person who thinks that he should represent me a boot. We give, even when we cannot afford to; he takes even though he could afford to.
John McCain talked about encouraging people to volunteer. To do more for others. Do it even if the govt doesn't pay you to do it. I agree helping people to do more, like volunteer for the Americorps, the Peace Corps, the military is something that is very important and we need to reward them. Especially the military who put their lives (and the welfare of their family) on the line. Those who join Americorps and Peace Corps get benefits of money to go to school. To improve their future and hopefully go back to work with others to bring benefits to all Americans.
It seemed to me that John McCain sought people to stand up and serve and that Mr. Obama wanted to create more govt. Same-o, same-o. Bigger govt and bigger taxes. Talk to the young who are unable to make choices because of brain development and ignore those of us who have lived a little more of life to have witnessed another day the world stood still.
I, and many other "older" people, do many kinds of volunteer work. I teach knitting and help in the community, to donate the products of my sticks and string to others. Hats, scarves and mittens for others in need, as well as baby things for prospective mothers.
Since Mr. Obama feels that the govt should do the giving (remind me again, isn't that MY tax money you are using), HE IS A GREAT EXAMPLE. He only gives 1%, YES THAT IS ONLY ONE PERCENT, a penny on the dollar, to charity, or to church or to any other entity that helps those in need. No wonder he went to a church where the preacher told others to god damn america and other such bigoted hatred. He is a real example of living a lie.
So let those of us who do, respect those others who do as well. Those who have served our country throughout their lives and get this misogynist, craven, disgraceful, egocentric, bigoted person who thinks that he should represent me a boot. We give, even when we cannot afford to; he takes even though he could afford to.
Labels:
bigoted,
craven,
egocentric,
misogynist,
nonvolunteerism,
not giving,
Obama,
offensive to elders,
selfish
Monday, September 8, 2008
Sexism in its worst form
I have become even more discouraged about the so-called "equality of the sexes" and the "women's movement" that started when I got out of high school. Burning bras and marches and even the ERA did not do it for us. Sure, there are more jobs open to us but they are still with less money. Very rarely do we get the opportunity and treatment that those with penises do.
It is so frustrating. Finally, this year we have had a woman campaigning FOR PRESIDENT!!! I may not have agreed with her politics but I was so proud. I thought we had finally turned a corner. But no, the sexist comments continued. The attacks because of her vagina instead of penis were incomprehensible. THAT IS NOT AN ISSUE. The issue is what she says that she will do.
So now, we have a person who is an actor, has only been running for office since he gave up his Community Organizing job. (my question is, Did it work? Did it make any change in the southside of Chicago?).
Then we get another woman. One headed for the Vice President position. Wow, I thought. Another strong woman who is more down to earth, has more experience and is one tough cookie. She has intelligent opinions on various topics and is eloquent and believable.
So where does the press go? She should stay home and be Suzie Housewife. She should be with her baby. She is a bad mother because her 17 year old is having a baby. And the angry militant feminists bought into it. They parroted the same thing right back at her just because she was ?pretty, ?smart, ?had a good husband, ????? It sounds like jealousy, or sour grapes, to me.
WHAT?????? Is this anything we should care about? What about her husband? Isn't he a father? Can't he take care of the family? Run the house? Just because he is a very masculine man, an outdoor sportsman, a commercial fisherman, a long distance extreme snowmobile competitor, this makes him unable to also change a diaper? Give me a break! This is double standardism at its worst.,
Did the press ask the question about whether Joe Biden could raise his sons as a single father when he ran for office? No. Should the fact that his sons were injured be cause for him to drop out of the race? Apparently not.
So why do they attack Sarah Palin? Because she is a woman. So why did they attack Hillary Clinton? Because she is a woman. So why did they attack Geraldine Ferraro? Because she is a woman. Get the picture?
The sad thing is the other women who do the same thing. They do not realize that this is a litmus test for us. If we do not get a woman elected during this campaign, we may not see a woman run for office for many years. We will have effectively been shut down.
We need to break that Crystal Ceiling once and for all. We need to stand up and proclaim that we are women and we are equal, and we do not need to have a penis. We need to stand up and tell the mainstream media to get out of our reproductive lives, out of a woman's place in the home and get out of the mommy role they keep wanting to shove us into.
Obama cannot do that for us. He cannot get us where we should be, we alone can do it.
We should rally to get every sexist reporter off the mainstream media screen and paper. Demand equal rights and equal treatment. Get back to the basics and get what we have fought for all these years. The right to be a woman, a feminine person, who does not have to have a biological appendage, or missing leg to the chromosome combination (XX without a leg to stand on is XY).
Stand up women, this is where we can finally let the rest of the world know that WE CAN DO IT. We can quit being second class citizens. We do not need to wear the burkas of convenience that men everywhere want to put on us. The so-called rights they have over us. We can use our brains and our abilities and get whatever we want.
It is so frustrating. Finally, this year we have had a woman campaigning FOR PRESIDENT!!! I may not have agreed with her politics but I was so proud. I thought we had finally turned a corner. But no, the sexist comments continued. The attacks because of her vagina instead of penis were incomprehensible. THAT IS NOT AN ISSUE. The issue is what she says that she will do.
So now, we have a person who is an actor, has only been running for office since he gave up his Community Organizing job. (my question is, Did it work? Did it make any change in the southside of Chicago?).
Then we get another woman. One headed for the Vice President position. Wow, I thought. Another strong woman who is more down to earth, has more experience and is one tough cookie. She has intelligent opinions on various topics and is eloquent and believable.
So where does the press go? She should stay home and be Suzie Housewife. She should be with her baby. She is a bad mother because her 17 year old is having a baby. And the angry militant feminists bought into it. They parroted the same thing right back at her just because she was ?pretty, ?smart, ?had a good husband, ????? It sounds like jealousy, or sour grapes, to me.
WHAT?????? Is this anything we should care about? What about her husband? Isn't he a father? Can't he take care of the family? Run the house? Just because he is a very masculine man, an outdoor sportsman, a commercial fisherman, a long distance extreme snowmobile competitor, this makes him unable to also change a diaper? Give me a break! This is double standardism at its worst.,
Did the press ask the question about whether Joe Biden could raise his sons as a single father when he ran for office? No. Should the fact that his sons were injured be cause for him to drop out of the race? Apparently not.
So why do they attack Sarah Palin? Because she is a woman. So why did they attack Hillary Clinton? Because she is a woman. So why did they attack Geraldine Ferraro? Because she is a woman. Get the picture?
The sad thing is the other women who do the same thing. They do not realize that this is a litmus test for us. If we do not get a woman elected during this campaign, we may not see a woman run for office for many years. We will have effectively been shut down.
We need to break that Crystal Ceiling once and for all. We need to stand up and proclaim that we are women and we are equal, and we do not need to have a penis. We need to stand up and tell the mainstream media to get out of our reproductive lives, out of a woman's place in the home and get out of the mommy role they keep wanting to shove us into.
Obama cannot do that for us. He cannot get us where we should be, we alone can do it.
We should rally to get every sexist reporter off the mainstream media screen and paper. Demand equal rights and equal treatment. Get back to the basics and get what we have fought for all these years. The right to be a woman, a feminine person, who does not have to have a biological appendage, or missing leg to the chromosome combination (XX without a leg to stand on is XY).
Stand up women, this is where we can finally let the rest of the world know that WE CAN DO IT. We can quit being second class citizens. We do not need to wear the burkas of convenience that men everywhere want to put on us. The so-called rights they have over us. We can use our brains and our abilities and get whatever we want.
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
News media feeding frenzy
The current news media are in a feeding frenzy of bias and attack. It is appalling the manner of their attack, on the baby, on the family, on the husband and has not put forth anything of the candidate. WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?
All I hear is how good Mr. Obama is and how horrible it is that the family of Sarah Palin is because they are regular people. It is very surprising to me that they haven't mentioned the DUIs that Congress has had, Ted Kennedy for one. How many times the Senators have gotten freebies and waved off because the elitists felt that they were above the law. Give me a break, the press are so two-faced.
It is sad that the people who are there to inform us and give us information which we can use to make an informed decision. Why, oh why, can't they be true to that ideal instead of to personal interests. I wonder too, HAS THE PRESS BEEN PAID TO BE POSITIVE TO ONE SIDE AND TO TRY TO ATTACK THE OTHER????
They are sitting there lying to the American people. They try to pick negative information on one side and ignore the facts on the other side. Rather giving us a good picture of what each candidate is and what they have done and what they are, the media is giving us trivia, focusing not on the issues but on little things.
All I hear is how good Mr. Obama is and how horrible it is that the family of Sarah Palin is because they are regular people. It is very surprising to me that they haven't mentioned the DUIs that Congress has had, Ted Kennedy for one. How many times the Senators have gotten freebies and waved off because the elitists felt that they were above the law. Give me a break, the press are so two-faced.
It is sad that the people who are there to inform us and give us information which we can use to make an informed decision. Why, oh why, can't they be true to that ideal instead of to personal interests. I wonder too, HAS THE PRESS BEEN PAID TO BE POSITIVE TO ONE SIDE AND TO TRY TO ATTACK THE OTHER????
They are sitting there lying to the American people. They try to pick negative information on one side and ignore the facts on the other side. Rather giving us a good picture of what each candidate is and what they have done and what they are, the media is giving us trivia, focusing not on the issues but on little things.
Monday, September 1, 2008
Tom Brokaw lost it
I was walking by the TV when I heard a very strident male voice. I turned to watch and saw it was Meet the Press. I looked and Mr. Brokaw looked very angry and belligerent. I started listening to his interview with the Governor of Minnesota. Every time Mr. Brokaw asked a question about Sarah Palin, the Governor had a strong answer for him that showed that she had more experience than Barack Obama. She had more experience in governing, more experience in national security, had been Commander in Chief of the Alaska National Guard, had negotiated with oil companies to provide a relief of gas prices to Alaskans and dealt with corruption in the Alaska government. All Mr. Obama had was that he had been a professional campaigner (my interpretation). I mean, after all, what is a community organizer. Did he make any difference and has it continued to grow after he left?
Mr. Brokaw had more and more of an expression which looked to me like he was angry that the Governor did not believe him and had a rebuttal for every question. It was almost like, How dare you think something other than what I say and how dare you question my belief in my candidate.
It was actually quite hysterical. It was a real evidence of Tom Brokaw's bias towards Mr. Obama because he actually defended Mr. Obama. I think he needs to retire for good if that is his idea of fairness in the news.
Mr. Brokaw had more and more of an expression which looked to me like he was angry that the Governor did not believe him and had a rebuttal for every question. It was almost like, How dare you think something other than what I say and how dare you question my belief in my candidate.
It was actually quite hysterical. It was a real evidence of Tom Brokaw's bias towards Mr. Obama because he actually defended Mr. Obama. I think he needs to retire for good if that is his idea of fairness in the news.
Labels:
anger,
biased news,
Brokaw,
Brokaw not impartial,
defending Obama,
Sarah Palin,
Tom Brokaw
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)